In the 1970s, a relatively dormant art form of creating one-of-a-kind prints gained new popularity
with the exhibition “The Painterly Print” presented jointly by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New
York, and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. I was doing monotypes in the traditional method of
transferring oil-based inks on paper with the use of an etching press. I was also experimenting
with encaustic painting. I wanted to combine the directness and immediacy of the monotype with
the richness and luminosity of encaustic painting. The result was a process that eliminated all the
slow and cumbersome steps of encaustic painting and the toxicity of inks and solvents of printing
on a press in the more traditional way. I called it the “Encaustic Monotype.” My first wax monotype
was juried into a show by Lucy Lippard in 1980. Encaustic monotypes were included in my
graduate thesis show in 1981 and I have continued to show the wax prints and my monotypes
done on a press.
In 1991, Daniel Smith awarded me a grant to publish my process in the Inksmith, a printmaking
newsletter. I have used excerpts from that article here and have added alterations and additional
information.
THE PROCESS
The process is simple: a wax crayon drawing made on a heated metal plate is transferred to a
sheet of paper using hand pressure; no printing press is needed. The plate is cleaned with paper
towels or rags; no toxic solvents are involved. This basic procedure provides the artist with a new
realm of printmaking using basic, inexpensive studio equipment.
MATERIALS
The Hotplate.
Several professional models are sold by printmaking suppliers. A substitute hotplate frame can
be made of wood or metal with basic tools found in a woodshop or welding shop and insulated
and wired with ceramic receptacles that use 100-watt incandescent lightbulbs. It can be built to
any desired size, preferably a size that fits standard art papers. The plate should be a metal gauge
of sufficient suspension strength to span the frame and to conduct heat evenly. Multiples of 16” X
18” will create an even heat to melt the crayons. My 19” X 32” double frame of 8 lightbulbs evenly
heats a plate 22” X 34” and accommodates 22” X 30” paper. For safety, any frame must be lined
with insulation on the sides and bottom. It should be raised above the surface of the worktable
with legs or it should be used on a metal or other heatproof surface.
The Crayons
When I began experimenting with this monotype process, I bought beeswax cakes fabricated by
theTorch company. When Richard Frumess began his business (R & F Handmade Paints) I was
disappointed that I still could not buy a pigmented beeswax crayon, so I made my own. The
crayons are fabricated in a simple two-part mold constructed from two identical ¾” maple boards
cut to any desired length. Clamp the boards in a vise or between C-clamps and drill to a
predetermined depth into the joined edges at regular intervals. Apply several coats of wood sealer
to the inside of the mold to reduce wax adhesion. Mix dry pigment with equal parts of beeswax in a
small can and pour into the mold openings. Allow 20 minutes or more to harden. Release the
clamp and the crayons will come free from the mold. There are many variations of this
fundamental procedure. Damar resin is used to harden encaustic painting pigments to be used
on a rigid substrate. Since the paper is flexible, I prefer a more flexible pigment. This reduces the
chances of pigment cracking during handling. I also like the ease of mark-making with the more
flexible pigment. There are paint modifiers to add to the mixture if more or less opacity is desired.
Some modifiers also aid in the suspension of the pigment in the wax.
Paper
The paper chosen can determine the outcome of the print. A very absorbent paper such as
mulberry fiber paper makes a softer image; the wax becomes a part of the paper. A smoother,
less absorbent paper results in sharper edges with greater contrast; the color sits on top.
THE IMAGE
All prints are made by drawing into a light field (the additive process) or removing areas of a dark
field (the negative process) or by a combination of the two. It delights and amazes me to see the
many fresh and diverse ideas that each individual artist brings to the process.
CONCLUSION
With the range of materials and techniques available for encaustic monotype, there are endless
possibilities for the experimental artist. It is my hope that each artist who tries this process will
translate the expertise they bring from other media to add to and improve what I have begun.
If you have questions about encaustic monotype procedures or want
to report your experiences with the process, contact me at:
d.furlong.gardner@gmail.com
You are viewing the text version of this site.
To view the full version please install the Adobe Flash Player and ensure your web browser has JavaScript enabled.
Need help? check the requirements page.